Tokenscope vs Sipcode

In-depth architectural comparison of the Tokenscope and Sipcode MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Tokenscope when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tokenscope Details

Choose Sipcode when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sipcode Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Tokenscope Finance & Fintech	Sipcode Finance & Fintech
Summary	Analyze Claude Code token cost & context attribution. Local, read-only MCP server.	Context hygiene for Claude Code: drift detection, re-read dedup, and token analytics.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tokenscope": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@wartzar-bee/tokenscope"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sipcode": {
      "url": "https://anuj7411.github.io/sipcode/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons