TokenSave vs Xrploracle

In-depth architectural comparison of the TokenSave and Xrploracle MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose TokenSave when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TokenSave Details

X

Choose Xrploracle when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: xrpl_overview, xrpl_rlusd, xrpl_account_intel.

Explore Xrploracle Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	TokenSave Developer Tools	X Xrploracle Developer Tools
Summary	Code intelligence for 15+ languages: semantic graph queries instead of file reads. 37 MCP tools.	XRPLOracle - 31 XRP Ledger tools: payments, DEX, AMM, hooks, NFTs, validators, DIDs.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tokensave": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@colbymchenry/codegraph"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "xrploracle": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons