TokenSave vs WhiteIntel — Ownership Intelligence

In-depth architectural comparison of the TokenSave and WhiteIntel — Ownership Intelligence MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose TokenSave when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TokenSave Details

W

Choose WhiteIntel — Ownership Intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore WhiteIntel — Ownership Intelligence Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	TokenSave Developer Tools	W WhiteIntel — Ownership Intelligence Developer Tools
Summary	Code intelligence for 15+ languages: semantic graph queries instead of file reads. 37 MCP tools.	UBO, sanctions & ownership graph. 23 tools, 130.7M entities, 31 registries.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tokensave": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@colbymchenry/codegraph"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "whiteintel-ownership-intelligence": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@whiteintel/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons