TokenSave vs Wellness Cycle Coach

In-depth architectural comparison of the TokenSave and Wellness Cycle Coach MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose TokenSave when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TokenSave Details

Choose Wellness Cycle Coach when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: cycle_agent_manifest, cycle_capabilities, cycle_connection_status.

Explore Wellness Cycle Coach Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	TokenSave Developer Tools	Wellness Cycle Coach Developer Tools
Summary	Code intelligence for 15+ languages: semantic graph queries instead of file reads. 37 MCP tools.	Local-first cycle coach MCP for phase-aware nutrition and training context.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tokensave": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@colbymchenry/codegraph"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wellness-cycle-coach": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "delx-wellness-hermes"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons