Token risk x402 vs Lemonsqueezy MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Token risk x402 and Lemonsqueezy MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Token risk x402 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Token risk x402 Details

Choose Lemonsqueezy MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lemonsqueezy MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Token risk x402 Finance & Fintech	Lemonsqueezy MCP Server Finance & Fintech
Summary	Pre-trade token safety checks for AI agents on Solana and Base. x402 USDC per call, no key.	Lemon Squeezy SDK as MCP server. Give your AI assistant access to payment and subscription data.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "token-risk-x402": {
      "url": "https://api.ogenalabs.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lemonsqueezy-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lemonsqueezy-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons