Token Risk vs Lemonsqueezy MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Token Risk and Lemonsqueezy MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose Token Risk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Token Risk Details

Choose Lemonsqueezy MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lemonsqueezy MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Token Risk Finance & Fintech	Lemonsqueezy MCP Server Finance & Fintech
Summary	Token Risk — rug-pull / honeypot screening for crypto tokens.	Lemon Squeezy SDK as MCP server. Give your AI assistant access to payment and subscription data.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "token-risk-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "token-risk-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lemonsqueezy-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lemonsqueezy-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons