Todo MCP vs Backup AI MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Todo MCP and Backup AI MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose Todo MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Todo MCP Details

Choose Backup AI MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Backup AI MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Todo MCP Developer Tools	Backup AI MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Create, list, and complete todo items through MCP.	Backup Ai automation via MCP. Includes create backup plan, verify backup, list backups. By M...
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "todo-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "todo-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "backup-ai-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons