Timps Swarm vs Baton

In-depth architectural comparison of the Timps Swarm and Baton MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Timps Swarm when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: 161 specialist MCP agents, Parallel sub-agent registration, Repository security auditing.

Explore Timps Swarm Details

Choose Baton when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Cross-agent session conversion, Canonical intermediate session representation, Automatic latest-session discovery.

Explore Baton Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Timps Swarm Coding Agents	Baton Coding Agents
Summary	161 AI agents for code gen, health, AI/ML, infra, India-stack. One command.	Pass the baton between coding agents: convert sessions across Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex & more.
Category & Scope	Coding Agents	Coding Agents
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "timps-swarm": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "timps-swarm"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "baton-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@kasabeh/baton-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons