TimeBase vs UniFi Access MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the TimeBase and UniFi Access MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose TimeBase when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TimeBase Details

U

Choose UniFi Access MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore UniFi Access MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	TimeBase Developer Tools	U UniFi Access MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Explore and query TimeBase streams, schemas, QQL, symbols, and server status via MCP.	Manage UniFi Access doors, credentials, policies, visitors, and events via MCP.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "timebase": {
      "url": "https://modelcontextprotocol.io/introduction"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "unifi-access-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "unifi-network-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons