Tiger MCP vs MCP Devkit Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Tiger MCP and MCP Devkit Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose Tiger MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tiger MCP Details

Choose MCP Devkit Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Devkit Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Tiger MCP Developer Tools	MCP Devkit Server Developer Tools
Summary	Provides programmatic access to Tiger Cloud services, databases, and documentation.	Provides AI assistants with direct access to Mapbox developer APIs and documentation.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tiger-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tiger-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-devkit-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@anthropic-ai/dxt"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons