TickerRisk vs Krs Poland MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the TickerRisk and Krs Poland MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose TickerRisk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: scan_ticker, find_wheel_candidates, find_covered_calls.

Explore TickerRisk Details

Choose Krs Poland MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Krs Poland MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	TickerRisk Legal	Krs Poland MCP Server Legal
Summary	Check options trades for hidden catalysts (earnings, FDA, legal, SEC) before you sell premium.	Polish National registry of businesses and other legal entities
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tickerrisk": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "tickerrisk-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "krs-poland-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "krs-poland-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons