TextMine MCP vs Translatize MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the TextMine MCP and Translatize MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose TextMine MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TextMine MCP Details

Choose Translatize MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Translatize MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T TextMine MCP Developer Tools	Translatize MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Search, read, and automate TextMine documents, records, workflows, integrations, and agent tasks.	Read, search, edit and branch Translatize translation labels and fill missing translations.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "textmine-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "textmine-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-149": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@translatize/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons