Texas DMV vs Connecticut DMV

In-depth architectural comparison of the Texas DMV and Connecticut DMV MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose Texas DMV when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Texas DMV Details

Choose Connecticut DMV when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Connecticut DMV Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Texas DMV Developer Tools	Connecticut DMV Developer Tools
Summary	Texas DMV: statewide registered vehicle totals by fiscal year	Connecticut DMV: vehicle-level electric vehicle registrations by town, make and model
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "texas-dmv": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "texas-dmv"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "connecticut-dmv": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "connecticut-dmv"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons