What is the key difference between Test Genie and Quash — Mobile App Automation?

Test Genie belongs to the Browser Automation category with local stdio execution, while Quash — Mobile App Automation belongs to the Browser Automation category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Test Genie or Quash — Mobile App Automation in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Test Genie and Quash — Mobile App Automation free or paid?

Test Genie operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Quash — Mobile App Automation operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Test Genie lists 0 tools with 1 views and 0 GitHub stars. Quash — Mobile App Automation lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Test Genie and Quash — Mobile App Automation together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Test Genie or Quash — Mobile App Automation in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Test Genie and Quash — Mobile App Automation free to use, or do they require API keys?

Test Genie is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Quash — Mobile App Automation operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Test Genie and Quash — Mobile App Automation at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both test-genie and quash-mobile-app-automation as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Test Genie has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 1 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Quash — Mobile App Automation holds a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Test Genie vs Quash — Mobile App Automation

In-depth architectural comparison of the Test Genie and Quash — Mobile App Automation MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Test Genie

Browser Automation · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Quash — Mobile App Automation

Browser Automation · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Test Genie if you need specialized Browser Automation tools running via a local process. Choose Quash — Mobile App Automation if your workspace requires Browser Automation integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Test Genie when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Test Genie Details

Choose Quash — Mobile App Automation when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Quash — Mobile App Automation Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Test Genie Browser Automation	Q Quash — Mobile App Automation Browser Automation
Summary	AI-powered app test automation for iOS, Android, Flutter, React Native, Web	Drive Android & iOS mobile-app automation from your AI agent on locally connected devices.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Test Genie Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Quash — Mobile App Automation Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Test Genie Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "test-genie": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "test-genie"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Quash — Mobile App Automation Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "quash-mobile-app-automation": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "quash-mobile-app-automation"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Test Genie is categorized under Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Quash — Mobile App Automation belongs to Browser Automation using local stdio subprocess. Select Test Genie when you need capabilities focused on browser automation and Quash — Mobile App Automation when you require tools for browser automation.

More alternatives to Test Genie More alternatives to Quash — Mobile App Automation Browser Automation category hub Canonical compare URL