AuraSDK vs Moxie Docs MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the AuraSDK and Moxie Docs MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AuraSDK when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Five-layer cognitive engine with belief, concept, causal, and policy layers, Deterministic memory storage and recall without embeddings or LLM calls, Encrypted storage using ChaCha20 and Argon2.

Explore AuraSDK Details

Choose Moxie Docs MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Freemium).
• Primary tools included: moxie.get_ai_context, moxie.get_doc_impact, moxie.get_api_context.

Explore Moxie Docs MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AuraSDK teolex2020 Knowledge & Memory	Moxie Docs MCP FeaturedVerifiedKnowledge & Memory
Summary	Persistent cognitive memory for Claude Desktop. Sub-ms recall, offline, encrypted.	MCP & Agent Skills for Automated Documentation, and codebase conventions + context
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "teolex2020-aurasdk": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "aura-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "moxie-docs-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "moxie-docs"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons