Telnyx vs Xposedornot

In-depth architectural comparison of the Telnyx and Xposedornot MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Telnyx when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Telnyx Details

X

Choose Xposedornot when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Xposedornot Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Telnyx Communication	X Xposedornot Communication
Summary	Official TypeScript library for the Telnyx API	XposedOrNot MCP — free breach-exposure lookup by email.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "telnyx-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "telnyx-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "xposedornot": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "xposedornot"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons