Searchpin vs Webcrawl MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Searchpin and Webcrawl MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Searchpin when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Parallel queries to Baidu, Sogou, Bing CN, and Bing Intl, Semantic embedding-based re-ranking of search results, Built-in SSR content extraction including JSON-LD and microdata.

Explore Searchpin Details

Choose Webcrawl MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: webcrawl_scrape, webcrawl_search, webcrawl_map.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Searchpin telly6 Search & Data Extraction	Webcrawl MCP andyliszewski Search & Data Extraction
Summary
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "telly6-searchpin": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "searchpin"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "andyliszewski-webcrawl-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "webcrawl-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons