Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Telegram vs Telemost MCP Server
In-depth architectural comparison of the Telegram and Telemost MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Telegram
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Telemost MCP Server
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Telegram if you need specialized Communication tools running via a local process. Choose Telemost MCP Server if your workspace requires Communication integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
T
Choose Telegram when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
T
Choose Telemost MCP Server when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Telegram Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Telemost MCP Server Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Telegram Configuration
Telemost MCP Server Configuration