Telegram Slack MCP vs Userport

In-depth architectural comparison of the Telegram Slack MCP and Userport MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Telegram Slack MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Telegram Slack MCP Details

U

Choose Userport when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Userport Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Telegram Slack MCP Communication	U Userport Communication
Summary	Read and reply to your personal Telegram chats and all your Slack workspaces.	Read and answer support conversations, and run outbound email and chat sequences, from your AI.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "telegram-slack-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "telegram-slack-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "userport-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "userport-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons