What is the key difference between Tech Risk and Seraph?

Tech Risk belongs to the Finance & Fintech category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution, while Seraph belongs to the Finance & Fintech category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Tech Risk or Seraph in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Tech Risk and Seraph free or paid?

Tech Risk operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Seraph operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Tech Risk lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Seraph lists 0 tools with 0 views and 4 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Tech Risk and Seraph together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Tech Risk vs Seraph

In-depth architectural comparison of the Tech Risk and Seraph MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Tech Risk

Finance & Fintech · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Seraph

Finance & Fintech · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Tech Risk if you need specialized Finance & Fintech tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Seraph if your workspace requires Finance & Fintech integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Tech Risk when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tech Risk Details

Choose Seraph when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Seraph Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Tech Risk Finance & Fintech	S Seraph Finance & Fintech
Summary	Scan any MCP server for tool-poisoning, prompt-injection & exfiltration risk (OWASP LLM01/LLM08).	Crypto transaction firewall and risk tools for MCP agents.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Tech Risk Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Seraph Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Tech Risk Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tech-risk": {
      "url": "https://x402-data-api.sigrunner.workers.dev"
    }
  }
}

Seraph Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seraph-2": {
      "url": "https://seraph.kondux.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Tech Risk is categorized under Finance & Fintech and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Seraph belongs to Finance & Fintech using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Tech Risk when you need capabilities focused on finance & fintech and Seraph when you require tools for finance & fintech.

More alternatives to Tech Risk More alternatives to Seraph Finance & Fintech category hub Canonical compare URL