Tarotari vs Ephemeris MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Tarotari and Ephemeris MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

T

Choose Tarotari when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tarotari Details

Choose Ephemeris MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_planetary_positions.

Explore Ephemeris MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	T Tarotari Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Ephemeris MCP Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Summary	Rider-Waite tarot deck and computed astronomy: charts, positions, exact aspect moments	Precision astronomical ephemeris and planetary positions via the Swiss Ephemeris.
Category & Scope	Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Aerospace & Astrodynamics

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tarotari": {
      "url": "https://www.tarotari.com/en/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ephemeris-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "ephemeris-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons