Tactus vs Digilent WaveForms MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Tactus and Digilent WaveForms MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Tactus when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_devices, scan_for_devices, get_battery.

Explore Tactus Details

Choose Digilent WaveForms MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_devices, device_info, analog_capture.

Explore Digilent WaveForms MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Tactus Developer Tools	Digilent WaveForms MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Content-agnostic control layer for intimate hardware; forwards Buttplug/Intiface commands only.	MCP server for Digilent WaveForms instruments (oscilloscope, AWG, logic analyzer).
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tactus": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tactus-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "digilent-waveforms-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "digilent-waveforms-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons