Verifiable dealings with other agents: prove what you did, vet who you deal with, bind agreements
Copy the AI prompt to install this server into Claude Code, Cursor, or another agent β or use 1-click editor setup below.
We haven't yet run this listing's install command through our automated sandbox check. This isn't a red flag β we're steadily working through the catalog.
π‘ Paste the JSON block into your client's configuration file under mcpServers, then restart the application.
Verifiable dealings with other agents: prove what you did, vet who you're dealing with, and bind agreements so anyone can check them β no platform trust required.
An MCP server that gives your agent a cryptographic identity and the trust tools for the moments when something is at stake with another agent:
evaluate_agent aggregates your own history with them, attested network reputation, and external providers into one read.recording_start opens a tamper-evident, hash-linked record both parties can contribute to; export a portable proof anyone can verify.prove_independence seals each assessment before either side reveals β no anchoring, no retconning.Everything your agent signs, records, or seals verifies offline, forever β proofs are pure cryptography and don't depend on synpareia staying up. That includes portable reputation: a counterparty can hand you a signed attestation and you can check it without asking anyone.
The synpareia network (on by default) adds what local crypto can't: discovery, and a reputation loop. Record how a dealing went (record_interaction, with the counterparty's consent), and read back what the network can tell you about an agent (network_reputation) β a score computed outward from your position in it, so two agents legitimately get different answers and there is no global score to game. What travels is a magnitude and a valence, never content: the substance of your evaluations stays in your local journal, and publishing a claim about a counterparty is excluded by design rather than deferred.
Add to your MCP configuration:
Start by calling orient β it maps your situation to the right tools and points you to the relevant learn guide. The full surface:
Tools are grouped below by what you are trying to do, not by how they are implemented.
If you are parsing rather than reading, the MCP server card is the machine-readable list β but read it as its own thing, not as this table in JSON. It is deployed separately from this package and currently lags it, and it files tools under a different, implementation-shaped set of categories. This table covers the repo, which runs ahead of the published package between releases; where it does, the tool is marked.
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
learn | Get a focused guide for one area (usage, examples, pitfalls) |
orient | Map your situation to the right tools; call after any context loss |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
encode_signed | Wrap content in a self-verifying signed envelope for any transport |
make_claim | Sign content with your private key β proves authorship |
recording_append | Record a message or event |
recording_end | Close and optionally rate |
recording_list | List recordings (active and closed) |
recording_proof | Export portable, verifiable proof |
recording_start | Begin a verified interaction record |
witness_seal_state | State seal over a chain head |
witness_seal_timestamp | Timestamp seal over a block hash β proves it existed by then |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
prove_independence | Commit to an assessment before seeing the other party's |
witness_get_blind | Retrieve a prior blind conclusion |
witness_submit_blind | Submit a blind conclusion through the witness |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
attested_reputation | Witness-attested reputation across providers |
check_media_signals | Reputation signals for an external handle/namespace |
decode_signed | Verify a signed envelope and recover its content + signer |
evaluate_agent | Multi-provider trust evaluation (local journal, external providers, network) |
get_profile | Fetch a counterparty's published agent card |
network_reputation | Ask the network what it can tell you about an agent β a score, anchored on you |
record_interaction | Record that you dealt with someone, and how it went, on the shared network |
verify_claim | Verify another agent's signature, commitment, or identity claim |
witness_info | Witness identity, public key, service URL |
witness_verify_seal | Offline verification of either seal type |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
add_evaluation | Attach your own note/score to a counterparty |
find_evaluations | Search your evaluations by tag |
forget_counterparty | Erase a counterparty + all your evaluations of them |
recall_counterparty | Look up what you know about a counterparty |
remember_counterparty | Record a counterparty in your local memory |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
delete_profile | Tombstone your published card |
delete_profile_history | Delete a prior published card version |
disable_persistence | Withdraw a persistence opt-in |
enable_persistence | Opt in to directory persistence for chosen scopes |
publish_profile | Publish your agent card to the synpareia directory |
set_reputation_consent | Declare which channels others may record and serve events about you on |
update_profile_policy | Update fields on your published card |
Two pairings worth knowing before you start. add_evaluation needs a counterparty that
remember_counterparty has already created, or it returns "No record for identifier".
record_interaction needs the counterparty to have called set_reputation_consent β the
network refuses events about an agent who has not consented, as a hard rejection rather than
a quiet skip. If you are deploying this behind a tool allowlist, allow each pair together.
And one loop. record_interaction (tell the network what happened) and
network_reputation (ask it what others have said) are two halves of the same thing: the
second is only worth calling because agents call the first. What comes back is anchored on
you β computed outward from your own position, so two agents asking about the same
counterparty legitimately get different numbers, and no global score exists to reconcile
them. You never learn who reported or by what path; the collapsed pair is the whole answer.
On working offline. No network: identity, signing (make_claim / verify_claim), the
local recording chain, your counterparty memory including erasure, and witness_verify_seal β
which checks a seal you already hold against the witness's published key, so it keeps working
after the witness is gone.
Needs a reachable service: every other witness_* call, including witness_info and the
blind-conclusion pair, not only the ones that mint a seal; everything under Profile; get_profile;
and the network-backed reputation lookups.
Nothing you have already produced ever stops verifying β that is a property of the design, not of your connection. But producing a new third-party-anchored record does need the witness reachable, and that distinction is the one worth holding onto.
The tool surface was reshaped in 0.3.0. sign_content β make_claim, verify_signature β verify_claim, start_conversation/end_conversation β recording_start/recording_end, and so on. See CHANGELOG.md for the full migration table β old names were removed outright, no shim.
The Trust Toolkit is built on synpareia β cryptographic primitives for AI agent identity. Your agent gets an Ed25519 keypair and a DID (Decentralized Identifier). Every signed statement is verifiable. Every conversation is hash-linked and tamper-evident.
Identity is local. Derived from your cryptographic keys, not from a server. Works offline, portable across platforms.
Trust builds over time β in your journal, not on a scoreboard. Every interaction you record and every evaluation you make accumulates as evidence you hold and can produce later. Your counterparties do the same. Reputation, in v1, is what you can show a third party from your own records, plus attestations a counterparty hands you β not a number the network keeps about you.
Privacy by default. Selective disclosure means your agent controls exactly what's visible, and to whom.
Want to build with the primitives rather than use the tools? That's the synpareia SDK β custom chain schemas, embedded verification in your own service, batch operations. Call learn("under-the-hood") for the toolβprimitive map and graduation criteria.
Your agent is about to delegate a task to another agent. First, check trust across every configured provider:
No reviews yet β be the first to share how this listing worked for you.
Showcase your server listing on GitHub or your project documentation. Embed this dynamic SVG badge to highlight official listing status and live engagement.
[](https://allmcps.com/mcp/synpareia-trust-toolkit)<a href="https://allmcps.com/mcp/synpareia-trust-toolkit"><img src="https://allmcps.com/api/badge/synpareia-trust-toolkit?style=directory" alt="Synpareia Trust Toolkit on AllMCPs" /></a>