Synchronity vs Tiny (Olist Tiny)

In-depth architectural comparison of the Synchronity and Tiny (Olist Tiny) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Synchronity when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the E-Commerce domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Synchronity Details

Choose Tiny (Olist Tiny) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the E-Commerce domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tiny (Olist Tiny) Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Synchronity E-Commerce	Tiny (Olist Tiny) E-Commerce
Summary	Shop connected e-commerce stores: search, compare, cart, and checkout with buyer approval.	Tiny (Olist Tiny) e-commerce ERP, one of the most used by online stores and marketplace sellers in B
Category & Scope	E-Commerce	E-Commerce
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "synchronity": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "synchronity"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tiny-olist-tiny": {
      "url": "https://claude.ai/new?modal=add-custom-connector#settings/customize-connectors"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons