What is the key difference between Swiss Case Law and Baserow?

Swiss Case Law belongs to the Databases category with local stdio execution, while Baserow belongs to the Databases category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Swiss Case Law or Baserow in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Swiss Case Law and Baserow free or paid?

Swiss Case Law operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Baserow operates under a Free / Open Source model (API Key required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Swiss Case Law lists 21 tools with 0 views and 53 GitHub stars. Baserow lists 6 tools with 2 views and 5,562 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Swiss Case Law and Baserow together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Swiss Case Law or Baserow in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Swiss Case Law and Baserow free to use, or do they require API keys?

Swiss Case Law is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Baserow operates under a Free / Open Source model with API Key required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Swiss Case Law and Baserow at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both swiss-case-law and bram2w-baserow as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Swiss Case Law has a Quality Score of 56 /100 ( Good ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 53 GitHub stars. Baserow holds a Quality Score of 52 /100 ( Good ) with 2 views, 0 installs, and 5,562 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Swiss Case Law vs Baserow

In-depth architectural comparison of the Swiss Case Law and Baserow MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Swiss Case Law

Databases · Local stdio

Quality: 56/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Baserow

Databases · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required

Verdict Summary: Choose Swiss Case Law if you need specialized Databases tools running via a local process. Choose Baserow if your workspace requires Databases integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Swiss Case Law when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: search_decisions, get_decision, list_courts.

Explore Swiss Case Law Details

Choose Baserow when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
You have access to required keys: BASEROW_DATABASE_URL, BASEROW_SECRET_KEY, BASEROW_REDIS_URL, BASEROW_EMAIL_HOST, BASEROW_EMAIL_PORT, BASEROW_EMAIL_USER, BASEROW_EMAIL_PASSWORD.
Primary tools included: Spreadsheet-style database with CRUD operations on tables and rows, Built-in AI assistant for natural language database and workflow creation, Support for automations and custom dashboards.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Swiss Case Law Databases	Baserow bram2w Databases
Summary	956k Swiss court decisions: full-text search, citation graph, statute lookup (DE/FR/IT)	Baserow database integration with table search, list, and row create, read, update, and delete capabilities.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Swiss Case Law Tools (21)

search_decisions

Full-text search with filters (court, canton, language, date range, chamber)

get_decision

Fetch a single decision by docket number or ID. Includes citation graph counts (cited by / cites).

list_courts

List all courts with decision counts

get_statistics

Aggregate stats by court, canton, or year

find_citations

Show what a decision cites and what cites it, with confidence scores

find_appeal_chain

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Swiss Case Law Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "swiss-case-law": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://mcp.opencaselaw.ch"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Baserow Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bram2w-baserow": {
      "url": "https://baserow.io"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Swiss Case Law is categorized under Databases and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Baserow belongs to Databases using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Swiss Case Law when you need capabilities focused on databases and Baserow when you require tools for databases.

More alternatives to Swiss Case Law More alternatives to Baserow Databases category hub Canonical compare URL