Sutra vs Chainmemory

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sutra and Chainmemory MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Sutra when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sutra Details

Choose Chainmemory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Chainmemory Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Sutra Knowledge & Memory	Chainmemory Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Private, portable memory and reusable skills for AI agents.	Permanent blockchain memory for AI agents.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sutra-2": {
      "url": "https://sutra.shivnathtathe.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "chainmemory": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "chainmemory-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons