Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World vs LibreJustice

In-depth architectural comparison of the Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World and LibreJustice MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World Details

Choose LibreJustice when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore LibreJustice Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Superstimulus Quest: Bounded Agent World Legal	LibreJustice Legal
Summary	Bounded agent exploration with persistent progress, deterministic receipts, and return contracts.	Search French and European case law and French legal texts (codes, statutes, treaties).
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "superstimulus-quest-bounded-agent-world": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "superstimulus-quest-bounded-agent-world"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "librejustice": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons