Supabase vs WHOOP MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Supabase and WHOOP MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Supabase when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Supabase Details

W

Choose WHOOP MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore WHOOP MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Supabase Databases	W WHOOP MCP Databases
Summary	MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform	Sync WHOOP recovery, sleep, strain, and workouts into Postgres and query them from any MCP client.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "supabase": {
      "url": "https://supabase.com/mcp#available-tools"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "whoop-mcp-6": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "whoop-mcp-6"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons