What is the key difference between Structa and Frasma?

Structa belongs to the Communication category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution, while Frasma belongs to the Communication category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Structa or Frasma in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Structa and Frasma free or paid?

Structa operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Frasma operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Structa lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Frasma lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Structa and Frasma together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Structa vs Frasma

In-depth architectural comparison of the Structa and Frasma MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Structa

Communication · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Frasma

Communication · Local stdio

Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Structa if you need specialized Communication tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Frasma if your workspace requires Communication integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Structa when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Structa Details

Choose Frasma when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Frasma Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Structa Communication	Frasma Communication
Summary	AI-native knowledge management for teams. Search, capture, and distill org knowledge from Claude.	Read-only Frasma MCP: profile, knowledge search, diagnostic handoff. No email.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Structa Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Frasma Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Structa Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "structa": {
      "url": "https://structa.me"
    }
  }
}

Frasma Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "frasma": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://www.frasma.org/api/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Structa is categorized under Communication and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Frasma belongs to Communication using local stdio subprocess. Select Structa when you need capabilities focused on communication and Frasma when you require tools for communication.

More alternatives to Structa More alternatives to Frasma Communication category hub Canonical compare URL