Infranode vs Luxembourg MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Infranode and Luxembourg MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Infranode when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Travel & Transportation domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Unified REST and MCP interfaces with 12 read-only tools, Normalized data schema with per-record license and attribution, Coverage of 84+ German cities and 67+ data types.

Explore Infranode Details

Choose Luxembourg MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Travel & Transportation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_datasets, get_dataset, geocode_address.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Infranode street1983nk Travel & Transportation	Luxembourg MCP amirdaraee Travel & Transportation
Summary
Category & Scope	Travel & Transportation	Travel & Transportation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "street1983nk-infranode": {
      "url": "https://mcp.infranode.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "amirdaraee-luxembourg-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "luxembourg-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons