Stopover Planner vs Flywizz

In-depth architectural comparison of the Stopover Planner and Flywizz MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Stopover Planner when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Travel & Transportation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Stopover Planner Details

Choose Flywizz when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Travel & Transportation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Flywizz Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Stopover Planner Travel & Transportation	Flywizz Travel & Transportation
Summary	Live Google Flights search: stopover itineraries, country sweeps, explore anywhere, booking links	Search Wizz Air flights from your AI agent. Unofficial.
Category & Scope	Travel & Transportation	Travel & Transportation
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "stopover-planner": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "stopover-planner"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "flywizz": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "Flywizz"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons