Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Stock Scanner MCP vs Stockfacts
In-depth architectural comparison of the Stock Scanner MCP and Stockfacts MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Stock Scanner MCP
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Stockfacts
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Stock Scanner MCP if you need specialized Finance & Fintech tools running via a local process. Choose Stockfacts if your workspace requires Finance & Fintech integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
S
Choose Stock Scanner MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
S
Choose Stockfacts when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Stock Scanner MCP Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Stockfacts Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Stock Scanner MCP Configuration
Stockfacts Configuration