Still Glowing vs Atlas — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Still Glowing vs Atlas
In-depth architectural comparison of the Still Glowing and Atlas MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Still Glowing
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Atlas
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Still Glowing if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Atlas if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
S
Choose Still Glowing when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Still Glowing is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Atlas belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Still Glowing when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Atlas when you require tools for developer tools.