Stellary Project Management MCP Server vs Xenmark

In-depth architectural comparison of the Stellary Project Management MCP Server and Xenmark MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Stellary Project Management MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Stellary Project Management MCP Server Details

Choose Xenmark when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Xenmark Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Stellary Project Management MCP Server Developer Tools	Xenmark Developer Tools
Summary	Connect AI assistants to Stellary projects, boards, documents, and governed agent workflows.	Read your Xenmark drawing reviews from AI assistants: projects, drawings, comments, notifications.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "stellary-project-management-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "xenmark": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "xenmark-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons