STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch vs Next Devtools MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch and Next Devtools MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch Details

Choose Next Devtools MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: nextjs_index, nextjs_call, nextjs_docs.

Explore Next Devtools MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S STEADYWRK Field Service Dispatch Developer Tools	Next Devtools MCP vercel VerifiedDeveloper Tools
Summary	Field service dispatch: instant quotes, tracked work orders, public evals. steadywrk.app	Official Next.js MCP server for coding agents. Provides runtime diagnostics, route inspection, dev server logs, docs search, and upgrade guides. Requires Next.js 16+ dev server for full runtime features.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "steadywrk-field-service-dispatch": {
      "url": "https://steadywrk.app/developers/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vercel-next-devtools-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "next-devtools-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons