Starling Bank vs ShipSwift

In-depth architectural comparison of the Starling Bank and ShipSwift MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Starling Bank when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Starling Bank Details

Choose ShipSwift when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ShipSwift Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Starling Bank Developer Tools	ShipSwift Developer Tools
Summary	Allow AI systems to view and control your Starling Bank account via MCP.	40+ production-ready SwiftUI recipes for building full-stack iOS apps via MCP.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "starling-bank": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "starling-bank-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shipswift": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons