Stackguide MCP vs Gitscrum Core MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Stackguide MCP and Gitscrum Core MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Stackguide MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: setup, context, rules.

Explore Stackguide MCP Details

Choose Gitscrum Core MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: task, sprint, workspace.

Explore Gitscrum Core MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Stackguide MCP Developer Tools	Gitscrum Core MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Dynamic context loading for AI assistants with TDD workflow and AST analysis	MCP server for GitScrum — manage tasks, sprints, time tracking, and client workflows via AI
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "stackguide-mcp-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@stackguide/mcp-server@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-93": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@gitscrum-studio/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons