Ssh MCP Pro vs Raycast

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ssh MCP Pro and Raycast MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ssh MCP Pro when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ssh MCP Pro Details

Choose Raycast when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Raycast Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ssh MCP Pro Developer Tools	Raycast Developer Tools
Summary	Secure MCP SSH automation server with policy controls, resources, prompts, stdio, and HTTP.	Raycast workflow automation MCP server with 9 tools
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ssh-mcp-pro": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ssh-mcp-pro"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "raycast": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "raycast-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons