Squirrelscan vs VaultVision Hyperliquid Vault Research

In-depth architectural comparison of the Squirrelscan and VaultVision Hyperliquid Vault Research MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Squirrelscan when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Squirrelscan Details

Choose VaultVision Hyperliquid Vault Research when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore VaultVision Hyperliquid Vault Research Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Squirrelscan Security	VaultVision Hyperliquid Vault Research Security
Summary	Audit websites for SEO, performance, security, accessibility and agent experience issues.	Read-only Hyperliquid vault search, risk, drawdown, rankings, TVL, alerts, and comparisons.
Category & Scope	Security	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "squirrelscan": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vaultvision-hyperliquid-vault-research": {
      "url": "https://vaultvision.tech/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons