SpryTools API MCP Server vs Name Tools

In-depth architectural comparison of the SpryTools API MCP Server and Name Tools MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose SpryTools API MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: hash_text, text_stats, validate_iban.

Explore SpryTools API MCP Server Details

Choose Name Tools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: generate_names, check_domain, screen_trademark.

Explore Name Tools Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	SpryTools API MCP Server Developer Tools	Name Tools Developer Tools
Summary	Utility tools for AI agents: hashing, text stats, validation, DNS, currency, GEO audits.	Generate startup names with an available .com, checked live, then screen US and EU trademarks.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sprytools-api-mcp-server-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sprytools-api-mcp-server-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "name-tools-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "startupnamegenerator-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons