Sports Context Protocol vs Sports

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sports Context Protocol and Sports MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Sports Context Protocol when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sports Context Protocol Details

Choose Sports when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_sports_events, search_players, get_live_matches.

Explore Sports Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Sports Context Protocol Sports	Sports Sports
Summary	Self-learning operational context layer for AI sports agents. Profile 001: golf.	Live football scores, match summaries, and fan clip links from Vublox. No API key required.
Category & Scope	Sports	Sports
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sports-context-protocol": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sports-context-protocol"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sports": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "@vublox/agent-tools"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons