Sportiq MCP vs Livetennisapi MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sportiq MCP and Livetennisapi MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Sportiq MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sportiq MCP Details

Choose Livetennisapi MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Freemium).
• You have access to required keys: LIVETENNISAPI_KEY.
• Primary tools included: get_live_matches, get_upcoming_matches, get_match.

Explore Livetennisapi MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Sportiq MCP Sports	Livetennisapi MCP livetennisapi Sports
Summary
Category & Scope	Sports	Sports
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sportiq-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sportiq-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "livetennisapi-livetennisapi-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "livetennisapi-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "LIVETENNISAPI_KEY": "YOUR_LIVETENNISAPI_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons