Spook SEO vs Facebook Ads Mcp Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Spook SEO and Facebook Ads Mcp Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Spook SEO when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Spook SEO Details

Choose Facebook Ads Mcp Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Lists ad accounts linked to a Meta access token, Retrieves detailed information for campaigns, ad sets, ads, and creatives, Fetches collections of ads and ad sets by account or campaign.

Explore Facebook Ads Mcp Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Spook SEO Marketing	Facebook Ads Mcp Server gomarble-ai Marketing
Summary	Free SEO tools + the Spook SEO autopilot: analyze domains, generate and publish SEO articles.	MCP server acting as an interface to the Facebook Ads, enabling programmatic access to Facebook Ads data and management features.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "spook-seo": {
      "url": "https://www.tryspook.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gomarble-ai-facebook-ads-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons