Spanlens vs Mcp Server

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Spanlens logo
Spanlens
spanlens
📊 Monitoring
Mcp Server logo
Mcp Server
iris-eval
📊 Monitoring
SummaryQuery your Spanlens LLM observability from any MCP client. 7 read tools for request logs, agent traces, cost stats, anomalies, model-savings, and per-user analytics across OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini. Open source, self-hostable. npx -y @spanlens/mcp-serverMCP-native agent evaluation and observability server with trace logging, output quality evaluation, cost tracking, 12 built-in eval rules, real-time dashboard, and PII detection.
Quality signal45/100 (Fair)48/100 (Fair)
Install pathnpx · highnpx · high
Engagement 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 7
ToolsRequest logging with full prompt, response, cost, and latency dataAgent tracing for multi-step and tool-based LLM callsCost tracking and model usage analytics across providersAnomaly detection and PII scanningPrompt versioning and A/B experiment supportSelf-hostable with a single Docker command and open source MIT licenseHierarchical span trace logging with latency, token usage, and cost13 built-in evaluation rules including PII and prompt injection detectionCost aggregation and budget threshold alertsReal-time dark-mode web dashboard for trace and evaluation visualizationSQLite storage for instant querying of trace dataCustom evaluation rules via Zod schemas
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView SpanlensView Mcp Server
More alternatives to SpanlensMore alternatives to Mcp ServerMonitoring categoryCanonical compare URL

Other servers like Spanlens