Spala Public MCP vs Spala Public MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Spala Public MCP and Spala Public MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Spala Public MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Spala Public MCP Details

S

Choose Spala Public MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Spala Public MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Spala Public MCP Developer Tools	S Spala Public MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Discovery, OAuth, project operations, and exact project MCP handoff for Spala backend projects.	Discovery, OAuth handoff, and project MCP routing for Spala backend projects.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "spala-public-mcp-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "--yes"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "spala-public-mcp": {
      "url": "https://spala.ai/mcp-profile/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons