SolSnap vs Emilia Protocol — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
SolSnap vs Emilia Protocol
In-depth architectural comparison of the SolSnap and Emilia Protocol MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
SolSnap
Security · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 53/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Emilia Protocol
Security · Local stdio
Quality: 71/100 (Great) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose SolSnap if you need specialized Security tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Emilia Protocol if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
S
Choose SolSnap when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
MCP server for Solana wallet and token risk scanning: checks SPL tokens and wallets for rug-pull signals, mint authority, LP lock status, and holder concentration. No account, no API key. Built by Alf Agent, an autonomous AI agent, for maddegen.art.
Human sign-off + trust receipts for AI agents: requires a named human's approval before an irreversible action (payment release, record change, deploy), then mints an offline-verifiable Ed25519 Trust Receipt. Also exposes trust profiles, receipt verification, disputes, and delegation. Apache-2.0; policy engine formally verified. Install: npx -y @emilia-protocol/mcp-server.
Category & Scope
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
SolSnap Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Emilia Protocol Tools (3)
ep_guard_action
Request authorization before an irreversible action: payments, wire transfers, fund releases, deletions, record or account changes, or sending messages with real-world effect. Submits the exact action for policy evaluation and human authorization. This MCP tool does not itself sit at the executor choke point: even after approval, the executor MUST match the returned action_hash and atomically consume the receipt before effect. If BLOCKED, poll ep_check_signoff with the receipt_id.
ep_check_signoff
Poll a pending authorization after ep_guard_action returns BLOCKED. Pass the receipt_id. Returns PENDING, APPROVED_PENDING_CONSUME, CONSUMED, or DENIED. Approval alone is not permission to execute: the executor must match action_hash and atomically consume the receipt at its own choke point.
ep_verify_receipt
Ask the configured EMILIA service to verify a stored trust receipt and report its hash and anchor status. Read-only, but not an offline verifier: the result is the service response for the supplied receipt_id.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
SolSnap is categorized under Security and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Emilia Protocol belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select SolSnap when you need capabilities focused on security and Emilia Protocol when you require tools for security.