A side-by-side look at the Solhint MCP and License Verify MCP MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Solhint MCP for legal work as a local process; choose License Verify MCP for legal as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
S
Choose Solhint MCP when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
You want tools like lint_solidity, lint_file, lint_project.
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Solhint MCP is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. License Verify MCP belongs to Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Solhint MCP for legal work and License Verify MCP for legal.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Solhint MCP is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. License Verify MCP is listed as a paid service. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add solhint-mcp and lmaniraruta-license-verify-mcp as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Solhint MCP has a quality signal of 53/100 (Good) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. License Verify MCP has 59/100 (Good) with 4 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.