Solana X402 Compliance vs Lemonsqueezy MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Solana X402 Compliance and Lemonsqueezy MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Solana X402 Compliance when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Solana X402 Compliance Details

Choose Lemonsqueezy MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lemonsqueezy MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Solana X402 Compliance Finance & Fintech	Lemonsqueezy MCP Server Finance & Fintech
Summary	RFC 9110 x402 Solana compliance screening and micropayments gateway for AI agents.	Lemon Squeezy SDK as MCP server. Give your AI assistant access to payment and subscription data.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "solana-x402-compliance": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "solana-x402-compliance"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lemonsqueezy-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lemonsqueezy-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons