Solana Security Standard vs X402 Receipt Verifier

In-depth architectural comparison of the Solana Security Standard and X402 Receipt Verifier MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Solana Security Standard when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Solana Security Standard Details

X

Choose X402 Receipt Verifier when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore X402 Receipt Verifier Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Solana Security Standard Finance & Fintech	X X402 Receipt Verifier Finance & Fintech
Summary	Scan Solana/Anchor code against the Solana Security Standard and serve the ruleset to MCP clients.	Audits NEXUS's own x402 payment logs against its own delivery logs and issues a signed proof-of-deli
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "solana-security-standard": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@jelleo/solana-security-standard"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "x402-receipt-verifier": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "x402-receipt-verifier"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons