Sociavault MCP vs Techtenstein Linkedin

In-depth architectural comparison of the Sociavault MCP and Techtenstein Linkedin MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

S

Choose Sociavault MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sociavault MCP Details

Choose Techtenstein Linkedin when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Techtenstein Linkedin Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	S Sociavault MCP Social Media	Techtenstein Linkedin Social Media
Summary	Scrape social data from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, X, LinkedIn, Reddit, and ad libraries.	Enrich LinkedIn profiles, companies, and prospect searches. For sales, recruiting, B2B.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sociavault-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sociavault-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "techtenstein-linkedin": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "techtenstein-linkedin-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons